<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arnold passed away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcofrasca.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/arnold-passed-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcofrasca.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/arnold-passed-away/</link>
	<description>The curious ways to see the World of a theoretical physicist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:41:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfrasca</title>
		<link>http://marcofrasca.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/arnold-passed-away/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mfrasca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 13:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcofrasca.wordpress.com/?p=2472#comment-1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But in the section &quot;Summary&quot; I find

&quot;Of the cleanly-formulated Hilbert problems, problems 3, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, and 21 have a resolution that is accepted by consensus. On the other hand, problems 1, 2, 5, 9, 15, 18+, and 22 have solutions that have partial acceptance, but there exists some controversy as to whether it resolves the problem.&quot;

I think some Wikipedia editor should properly fix this. Arnold is claimed to have solved this problem.

Marco]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But in the section &#8220;Summary&#8221; I find</p>
<p>&#8220;Of the cleanly-formulated Hilbert problems, problems 3, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, and 21 have a resolution that is accepted by consensus. On the other hand, problems 1, 2, 5, 9, 15, 18+, and 22 have solutions that have partial acceptance, but there exists some controversy as to whether it resolves the problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think some Wikipedia editor should properly fix this. Arnold is claimed to have solved this problem.</p>
<p>Marco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humble reader</title>
		<link>http://marcofrasca.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/arnold-passed-away/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[humble reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcofrasca.wordpress.com/?p=2472#comment-1254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least according to Wikipedia, which may or may not be correct, or may depend on the editor ;), the 
XIII-th Hilbert problem is still unresolved.

&quot;A variant of this problem, searching for a solution within the universe of continuous functions, was solved by Andrei Kolmogorov and Vladimir Arnold. It is not difficult to show that the problem has a positive solution within the space of single-valued analytic functions (Raudenbush). Some authors argue that Hilbert intended for a solution within the space of (multi-valued) algebraic functions, thus continuing his own work on algebraic functions and being a question about a possible extension of the Galois theory (see, for example, Abhyankar,[14] Vitushkin,[15] Chebotarev [16] and others). It appears from one of Hilbert&#039;s papers [17] that this was his original intention for the problem.
The language of Hilbert there is &quot;...Existenz von algebraischen Funktionen...&quot;, i.e., &quot;...existence of algebraic functions...&quot;. As such, the problem is still unresolved.&quot;
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert&#039;s_problems&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert&#039;s_problems&lt;/a&gt;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least according to Wikipedia, which may or may not be correct, or may depend on the editor <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> , the<br />
XIII-th Hilbert problem is still unresolved.</p>
<p>&#8220;A variant of this problem, searching for a solution within the universe of continuous functions, was solved by Andrei Kolmogorov and Vladimir Arnold. It is not difficult to show that the problem has a positive solution within the space of single-valued analytic functions (Raudenbush). Some authors argue that Hilbert intended for a solution within the space of (multi-valued) algebraic functions, thus continuing his own work on algebraic functions and being a question about a possible extension of the Galois theory (see, for example, Abhyankar,[14] Vitushkin,[15] Chebotarev [16] and others). It appears from one of Hilbert&#8217;s papers [17] that this was his original intention for the problem.<br />
The language of Hilbert there is &#8220;&#8230;Existenz von algebraischen Funktionen&#8230;&#8221;, i.e., &#8220;&#8230;existence of algebraic functions&#8230;&#8221;. As such, the problem is still unresolved.&#8221;<br />
(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert's_problems" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert&#039;s_problems</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
