I am glad to hear that you share this view. Of course, it needs a support from experiments and today there is none. Opinion is not enough, one needs something to compare with experimental data.

I think you have misunderstood what I did in my papers: I get an interquark potential being a sum of Yukawa potentials at the leading order. Each term is damped by an exponential increasing with level in the mass spectrum. This does not grant confinement but it is obtained at the next-to-leading order generating a linear potential.

Marco

Your statement “So far, I believed to be the only man on Earth to trust a complete absence of mass terms in the Standar Model (we call this conformal symmetry)” is not quite true.

For one, I have the same opinion for long time (see my math-ph arXiv preprints of the last 3 years). I am puzzled though that yours and others papers do not heed the true meaning of Yukawa short range principle: a mass is the quantum anomaly
resulting from a quantization of a (possibly massless) classical field.

Alexander