CERN announced today (see CERN announcement) that a relevant new effect has been observed by CMS experiment at LHC. Due to its deep similarities with the analogous effect seen at heavy ion collision facilities, it is possibly the first observation of a quark-gluon plasma in proton collisions in a high-energy experiment. A paper has been sent out for review. They made quark bound looser indeed. A first important finding from LHC.
Quark-gluon plasma seen at CERN22/09/2010
Sannino and the mass gap in Yang-Mills theory03/09/2010
August is vacation month in Italy and I am not an exception. This is the reason for my silence so far. But, of course, I cannot turn off my brain and physics has always been there. So, reading the daily from arxiv today , I have seen another beautiful paper by Francesco Sannino (you can find his page here) in collaboration with Joseph Schechter that has been his PhD thesis advisor. As you know, Sannino and Ryttov postulated an exact beta function for QCD starting from the exact result in the supersymmetric version of this theory (see here). The beta function Sannino and Schechter get has a pole. The form is
and, taken as is, this has no fixed point than the trivial one . We know that this seems in agreement with recent lattice computations even if, discussing with Valentin Zakharov at QCD10 (see here), he expressed some skepticism about them. They point out that the knowledge of this function permits a lot of interesting computations and what they do here is to get the mass gap of the Yang-Mills theory. They also point out as, for all the observables obtainable from such a beta function, the pole is harmless and the results appear really meaningful. Indeed, they get a consistent scenario from that guess.
So, let me point out the main results obtained so far by these people using this approach:
- The beta function for Yang-Mills theory goes to zero with the coupling without displaying non-trivial fixed point but QCD has a non-trivial fixed point (see my paper here).
- Yang-Mills theory has a mass gap.
Numerically their result for the mass gap seems to agree quite well with lattice computations. This should be also the mass for a possible observation of the lightest glueball. My view about is that the lightest glueball is the resonance and recent findings at KLOE-2 seems to point out in this direction. But the exact value of the mass gap is not so relevant. What is relevant is that these researchers have found a quite interesting exact form of the beta function for QCD that describes quite well the current understanding of this theory at lower energies that is slowly emerging.